• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Controller loses situational awareness

By General Aviation News Staff · May 8, 2025 · 4 Comments

This is an excerpt from a report made to the Aviation Safety Reporting System. The narrative is written by the pilot, rather than FAA or NTSB officials. To maintain anonymity, many details, such as aircraft model or airport, are often scrubbed from the reports.

I was the instructor during a training flight with my brother, who was acting as pilot in command (PIC) of his Aircraft X.

As we were in the traffic pattern, we were instructed by Tuscaloosa Tower to make left closed traffic for Runway 22, which we did, upon turning downwind, we were flying parallel with Aircraft Y, who had entered the traffic pattern from the south and descended into it.

Both planes were at the same spot in the traffic pattern (left downwind for Runway 22). We were flying a wider pattern than Aircraft Y.

Shortly after spotting the plane, Tuscaloosa Tower instructed Aircraft Y to make a right 360 for spacing. The pilot followed his instruction and made a right turn, which put the Aircraft Y pilot heading towards us during his turn, because of the relative position of the two planes, Aircraft Y turned behind us and finished the right 360.

Had the Aircraft Y pilot been faster or ahead of us in the traffic pattern, evasive action would have been required to avoid a mid-air collision.

This event was followed by Tower instructing us to do a right 360 for spacing also, which allowed the Aircraft Y pilot to land ahead of us.

I believe the cause of this near mid air collision was the Tower Controller’s lack of situational awareness. I do not believe he knew we were both on the downwind until he made a mistake. There were two planes in the pattern and a small plane flying a practice approach inbound, as well as a jet inbound, which I believe led to task saturation for the controller and the loss of situational awareness.

I also believe that the Aircraft Y pilot did not know where we were for the majority of this event, likely due to not being able to see us under him while he was descending into the pattern.

Primary Problem: Human Factors

ACN: 2193816

When you click on the link it will take you to the ASRS Online Database. Click on Report Number and put the ACN in the search box, then click Search. On that page, click on “view only the 1 most recent report.”

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Tom Curran says

    May 10, 2025 at 10:00 am

    Hey fellow CFIs & PICs;

    Controllers are human: If you think ATC is doing something silly that is putting you or others at risk …speak up!!!

    I’m not sure I’d trundle along quiet and happy while another aircraft was intentionally turned into me, without hearing ATC point me out to them, and receive verbal acknowledgment that they had “traffic in sight”!

    I don’t know if/how the other 4 reported planes factored into this goat rope; otherwise, what ATC orchestrated here makes no sense:

    “Both planes were at the same spot in the traffic pattern (left downwind for Runway 22). We were flying a wider pattern than Aircraft Y.”

    So…the planes were basically in a line abreast-ish formation (+/-), on downwind, with Aircraft Y closer to the runway.

    I don’t care how Aircraft Y got “there” in the first place …but the two subsequent 360 degree turns were crazy-stupid, unnecessary maneuvers.

    Not sure why ATC didn’t have just
    the ‘outside’ aircraft, Aircraft X, do a right 360 for spacing …and roll out behind Aircraft Y.

    Or…just have the ‘inside’ aircraft, Aircraft Y, fly a normal base leg …and have Aircraft X continue straight ahead on downwind for spacing?

    Reply
  2. JS says

    May 9, 2025 at 6:16 am

    I honestly don’t understand why pilots are filing reports with such minor drivel. It’s your job as a pilot to be aware of what’s happening around you; especially in busy controlled airspace. You, not the controller, are responsible for the safe operation of your aircraft. Controllers make mistakes. It happens every day. Work with them and carry on.

    Reply
    • Oneworld says

      May 12, 2025 at 10:48 pm

      Then ask them.

      Reply
  3. James B. Potter says

    May 9, 2025 at 5:07 am

    As the Wise Man once said: “Trust but verify.”
    Regards/J

    Reply

Leave a Reply to James B. Potter Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines