• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Test flight ends in crash

By NTSB · October 8, 2024 · 12 Comments

The pilot reported that he was performing a test flight in the experimental Roaring Eagle after completing a modification to the pitch control system.

While on downwind to land at the private airstrip near Stanwood, Iowa, the engine lost partial power.

During the base to final turn, about 300 feet above ground level, the airplane exceeded its critical angle of attack, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and loss of airplane control at an altitude too low to allow for recovery.

The airplane hit a cornfield short of the private airstrip and sustained substantial damage to the fuselage and both wings. The pilot sustained minor injuries in the crash.

The pilot stated that the partial loss of engine power was due to excessive fuel pressure to the carburetor because he forgot to open a valve that bypassed fuel around the fuel pump that is used for engine priming and starting.

Probable Cause: The pilot’s exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle of attack in the traffic pattern, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and loss of airplane control at too low of an altitude to recover. Contributing to the accident was the partial loss of engine power due to improper management of the fuel system.

NTSB Identification: 106093

To download the final report. Click here. This will trigger a PDF download to your device.

This October 2022 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Walter Clark says

    October 10, 2024 at 7:04 am

    There is no substitution for experience, staying in the envelope, checklists, having plan B ready for implementation and old fashion aerodynamic common sense.
    I can prove it with over 6000 hours of PIC time in most everything that flys or floats.
    Planning, planning, planning.

    Reply
    • Scott Patterson says

      October 12, 2024 at 9:37 am

      I believe all of that is dependent on a person’s level of comprehension. Because you read it, where instructed about it, and are doing it to same degree doesn’t necessarily mean someone really understands it. No matter the hours many have a Waterloo somewhere, just a matter of whether they ever meet it.

      Reply
    • Some pilot says

      October 13, 2024 at 9:08 am

      Guys like you crash all the time. “Hours” are not a defense against crashing. Be nice if they were, but nope.

      Reply
  2. Michael says

    October 9, 2024 at 9:16 pm

    At 300 ft i would rather stall and try for a tail landing and pray the power plant doesn’t end up in my lap🤔

    Reply
  3. George Olson says

    October 9, 2024 at 10:42 am

    There is dangerous flying __ where the pilot doesn’t know what they are doing and the Interesting Flying.
    The type that had me Worried when I saw it and the chap standing next to me said ” Oh it is OK — Australian CAA (FAA) forbids aerobatics so he goes to the EDGE of the law. He flew Spitfires in WW2 and just likes show off with little treats for us.
    The 2,000 foot drop Knife Edge 90 degree Side Slip after releasing the glider from tow to get back down for the next tow. Which then had the landing approach 200 feet to high and an with altitude correction by Perfectly Flat Straight Down the runway Horizontal Side Slip — Straightened to create perfect touch down on the runway 25 feet from our position from us stand on the grass beside the tarmac. Technically NOT Aerobatics.
    “”1969 Northam West Australia””

    Reply
  4. Davis B says

    October 9, 2024 at 7:16 am

    It may not have been so in this case, however, I have noticed in the past many months that more and more low-time pilots are waiting too long before turning from the base to the final legs in the patterns. Many overshoot the final. There’s nothing wrong with executing a shallower curving arc to the runway.

    Reply
  5. JimH in CA says

    October 8, 2024 at 1:57 pm

    Marvel-Schebler specs the max fuel pressure at 6.0 psi. A higher fuel pressure will ‘flood’ the carb, allowing fuel to run out the throat and into the airbox, and a potential fire hazard.
    Was this builder too lazy to install a fuel primer system, as used in most MS carb engines.
    I’m surprised that the engine would run smoothly at this excessive fuel pressure.?

    My British motorcycle had a plunger on the Amal carb that depressed the float. When fuel streamed out the overflow port, the engine was easily started.
    But, the plunger was spring loaded, so it could not be left depressed.

    Then there is the poor pattern flying, with 300 ft at the base -final turn is way too low, unless the turn is made very close to the runway…!
    And, with only 11 hrs in the aircraft he probably had no idea of the glide performance.?

    Reply
    • Mike Walling says

      October 9, 2024 at 4:59 am

      Yet another pilot error which adds to public impression that flying is dangerous

      Reply
      • James Brian Potter says

        October 9, 2024 at 7:12 am

        That’s because it is, like do-it-yourself brain surgery.
        /J

        Reply
    • Mark Austin says

      October 10, 2024 at 6:59 am

      Better known as a “Tickler”..
      My 72 Triumph Bonneville has two.

      Reply
      • RJ says

        October 12, 2024 at 6:35 pm

        My 70 Triumph had 3.

        Reply
      • JimH in CA says

        October 13, 2024 at 3:01 pm

        Yes, I didn’t thing that pilots would know that term. 🙂
        Mine was a ’66 BSA Thunderbolt, single carb.

        Reply

Leave a Reply to Mark Austin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines