• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Missing hardware contributes to loss of control on landing

By NTSB · April 29, 2024 ·

The pilot of the Cessna 172 reported that, during the landing roll at the airport in Tucson, Arizona, the airplane veered left unexpectedly.

He applied corrective action with rudder input, but the airplane continued to veer left, exited the left side of the runway, hit a ditch, and nosed over.

The airplane sustained substantial damage to the right-wing lift strut, vertical stabilizer, and rudder.

Post-accident examination of the airplane revealed that the bolt, spacer, nut, and cotter pin connecting the upper torque link and the lower torque link was missing and not observed with the wreckage.

It further revealed that the upper and lower torque links were not damaged.

A review of the airplane maintenance records did not reveal any recent maintenance conducted on the nose landing gear torque links.

Probable Cause: The loss of directional control during the landing roll due to missing hardware which resulted in the separation of the nose landing gear torque links.

NTSB Identification: 104911

To download the final report. Click here. This will trigger a PDF download to your device.

This April 2022 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Robert West says

    May 1, 2024 at 11:14 am

    Aircraft owners and pilots need to be mindful that maintenance Errors create significant hazard and must act accordingly the most likely time for an aircraft to suffer mechanical problem is on the first flight after maintenance be thoroughly Skeptical anytime Aircraft comes out of the shop your preflight and post flight maintenance test flight or last line of defense against maintenance errors.

  2. Mitch says

    April 30, 2024 at 6:23 am

    A lack of attention to detail and lack of inspection after the maintenance action. Lack of proper preflight check list. Inexcusable.
    Pilot, A&P, 40 + years as aircraft mechanic.

    • Cary Alburn says

      April 30, 2024 at 10:32 am

      Why do you say failure to preflight? What if it looked good on the ground but came apart in the air?

      • JimH in CA says

        April 30, 2024 at 10:43 am

        The nut and bolt cannot come out if the cotter pin is there locking the castellated nut in place, as on the axle nut with a cotter pin, in the pic.
        The cotter pins or the nut had to be missing before the flight.
        It’s easy to see the hardware while sumping the gascollator…if he did that.?

        I fly a similar Cessna with the same nose gear.

  3. James Brian Potter says

    April 30, 2024 at 5:53 am

    Either intentional sabotage or drugs in the workplace.
    Regards/J

  4. JimH in CA says

    April 29, 2024 at 8:15 am

    From the pic of the nose strut, the bolt attaching the fork to the strut tube is also missing.
    [ the tube is an interference fit to the fork, so the bolt really only holds the upper failing attach point.]
    This bolts has to be removed to remove the wheel faring. So, maybe someone serviced the tire or bearings and didn’t completely reassemble the nose gear parts.?
    Also, the fork casting split in half at the tube…interesting, since this is the newer, stronger casting..??

    • WK Taylor says

      April 30, 2024 at 8:53 am

      Odd… sometimes I get dumb. For the life of me, I could NOT find the close-up photos of the NLG you were alluding-to. Please advise the link.

      • JimH in CA says

        April 30, 2024 at 10:09 am

        it’s in the ‘FAA Record of email correspondence’, in the docket.
        https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=104911

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines