• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Improper installation of fuel selector handle leads to fuel starvation

By NTSB · April 7, 2023 ·

The pilot assisted a mechanic with a 100-hour inspection, and he then conducted an operational check of the float-equipped Cessna A185F, which included an inspection and a run-up of the airplane.

He then departed the airport in North Vernon, Indiana, and, after retracting the landing gear and flaps, the engine lost power.

Unable to make it back to the airport, he selected a nearby golf course for a forced landing. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the empennage and aft section of the fuselage.

Examination of the airplane by an FAA inspector revealed that the left fuel tank contained 10 gallons of fuel and the right fuel tank contained 15 gallons of fuel.

The inspector reported that the mechanic had to leave work early, and the pilot installed portions of the interior, which included the fuel selector handle.

Examination of the fuel selector handle found that the handle had been installed incorrectly by 90° on the fuel selector shaft. The fuel selector shaft was “keyed” so that the fuel selector handle could be installed in only one way, however the handle partially fit over the stem and allowed the attaching screw to partially engage on the shaft. The fuel selector handle was on the left tank position, but the orientation of the fuel selector shaft as positioned restricted all fuel flow to the engine.

A post-accident engine test run was conducted with the engine operated at full throttle; the fuel selector was placed in the left, right, and both positions. The engine operated with the fuel selector in each of these positions with no anomalies noted.

Probable Cause: The pilot’s improper installation of the fuel selector handle, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation.

NTSB Identification: 102937

To download the final report. Click here. This will trigger a PDF download to your device.

This April 2021 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Mac says

    April 10, 2023 at 9:35 am

    No insurance claim here!!!!!

  2. Mac says

    April 10, 2023 at 9:34 am

    No insurance Liam here!!!!

  3. scott k patterson says

    April 10, 2023 at 8:12 am

    So it’s saying a run-up, taxi and departure was accomplished before the fuel selector created a problem?
    And what is the ratio between certified mechanics vs owner caused mechanical malfunctions?

  4. Gordon Gunter says

    April 10, 2023 at 7:12 am

    What little money the pilot saved by helping if any at all doesn’t amount anywhere close to even the deductible. People let the pros do their work it’s well worth what you get back in return.

  5. Francis D Koester says

    April 10, 2023 at 6:00 am

    This is why, I, as an IA frown on “Owner Assist”.

    • JimH in CA says

      April 12, 2023 at 5:25 pm

      This pilot appears to not own the aircraft, per the 6120 form.
      So, why was he doing any work on the aircraft ?

  6. Henry K. Cooper says

    April 10, 2023 at 5:31 am

    I sure hope the mechanic didn’t sign off on the 100 hour inspection before it was totally completed, when having to leave early! That, and an engine run-up which is normally s final part of the inspection would have caught this error.

  7. Will says

    April 7, 2023 at 9:36 am

    65.81a Hmmmm….

    • JimH in CA says

      April 7, 2023 at 4:53 pm

      Yes, and the mechanic left without supervising the pilot’s installation of the fuel selector handle.?
      I’ll assume that the mechanic did not point out the ‘D’ shaped keying of the handle to the shaft ?
      So, the pilot did some non-allowed work, did it wrong, and crashed the aircraft.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines