• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Fuel starvation results when pilot puts fuel selector in wrong spot

By NTSB · January 27, 2021 ·

The pilot started the day with 40 gallons of fuel onboard the Piper PA-32RT-30 Lance II and confirmed a pilot logbook entry for 1.3 flight hours on the day of the accident. That included flights from Taylor Municipal Airport (T74) in Texas to Austin Executive Airport (KEDC) and from KEDC to Lakeway Airpark (3R9).

The logbook did not include an entry for another flight from 3R9 to KEDC or the accident flight. After departing KEDC to fly to T74, the engine started running rough. He moved the fuel selector handle alternatively between the left and right fuel tank positions, turned on the fuel pump, and advanced the mixture to full rich, but the engine roughness continued.

The pilot tried to return to KEDC, but could not make it. He performed an off-field landing to a road near Pflugerville, Texas, where the airplane hit a parked car. The right wing separated from the fuselage during the crash and the airplane flipped upside down. The pilot sustained minor injuries in the crash.

When the plane was recovered at the accident site, nine gallons of fuel was found in the left wing.

The inboard right wing tank did not contain any fuel and the right fuel cap was secure on the wing when viewed at the accident scene by FAA inspectors. The right tank fuel lines were compromised where the wing separated from the fuselage during the accident, and the right outboard fuel tank was ruptured where leading edge impact damage occurred.

No evidence of fuel leakage from the right wing tanks was evident and no fuel was found in the right wing tanks by recovery personnel.

FAA inspectors documented the fuel selector handle in a position about 1 to 2 inches past center towards the right tank position.

According to the Pilot’s Operating Handbook for the airplane: “When the fuel selector handle is not in a positive selector detent position, more than one fuel port will be open at the same time. It should be ascertained the fuel selector is positioned in a detent, which can be easily felt when moving the handle through its various positions.”

Probable Cause: The pilot’s fuel mismanagement and his improper use and placement of the fuel selector, contrary to operating procedures, which resulted in a partial loss of engine power due to fuel starvation.

NTSB Identification: 98929

This January 2019 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. JimH in CA says

    January 29, 2021 at 10:11 am

    This problem is common to most low-wing aircraft that have to pull fuel from a tank with a pump. If a tank is empty and the fuel selector is positioned so as to open the valve to two tanks, one which has no fuel, the pump will draw air into the fuel line.
    So, as was said by others, the selector has to be carefully positioned to only open the valve to a line with fuel in it.

    It seems to me that if a float operated shutoff valve was in each tank, sort of like an upside down carb float, the empty [ no usable fuel ], tank could not allow air to be drawn into the fuel lines.
    So, a partly positioned selector would still allow fuel to be drawn into the fuel lines.

    This situation is why my preference is a high-wing aircraft, that uses gravity flow from both tanks to the carb ; no switching tanks and no fuel pump to fail,
    and, I set my clock so that I know how many hours I’ve been flying, vs the fuel onboard.

  2. JimH in CA says

    January 28, 2021 at 9:21 pm

    I can’t understand why a pilot would go flying without knowing how long the fuel will last ?
    The poh is accurate on fuel burn vs percent power.
    It’s pretty simple math…. only a stupid pilot would try to fly after all the fuel is gone.

    So, for the cost of a few gallons of fuel, he wrecks the aircraft.!

  3. BJS says

    January 28, 2021 at 6:55 am

    One bright spot with all these constant fuel mismanagement accidents is, if you make certain to have plenty of fuel and manage it properly the likelihood of an accident is apparently practically nil.

    • gbigs says

      January 28, 2021 at 12:13 pm

      Getting the fuel selector wrong is a no-win no matter how much fuel you start with…ya just gotta make sure its all the way one side or the other.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines