• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Water in fuel system leads to loss of engine power

By NTSB · September 16, 2019 ·

According to the pilot, who was the owner of the Cessna 152, the plane had been parked for an extended period. He was preparing it for an annual inspection, which was nearly four years overdue.

On the day before the accident, he charged the airplane’s battery and ran the engine for about 30 minutes.

Before departing on the accident flight, he performed a preflight inspection, measured the level of fuel in each tank, sampled the fuel tanks and fuel strainer for contaminants, and ran the engine for about five to seven minutes with no anomalies noted.

He taxied the airplane for takeoff, performed the before-takeoff checks, and departed the airport in Winder, Georgia.

When the plane reached about 200′ above ground level, the engine “sputtered” and then stopped producing power.

He performed a forced landing to a field beyond the departure end of the runway, which resulted in substantial damage to the fuselage and wings.

The left-wing fuel tank was breached by impact and contained no fuel. The right tank was intact and contained about eight gallons of fuel. The gascolator was drained, and the first four ounces were clear water. The remaining four ounces were a mixture of water and fuel.

The carburetor was separated from the engine at impact and was reattached with an adhesive to facilitate an engine operational check. An external fuel tank was then plumbed to the carburetor, and the engine was started on the airframe using the airplane’s own battery. The engine started immediately, accelerated smoothly, and ran continuously without interruption.

Had the pilot conducted an adequate preflight inspection, he would have likely detected the water contamination in the fuel system.

Probable cause: The pilot’s inadequate preflight inspection, which resulted in undetected water in the fuel system and a total loss of engine power during the initial climb.

NTSB Identification: ERA17LA336

This September 2017 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Ken T says

    September 17, 2019 at 6:45 am

    Who writes these headlines? And who proofreads?? “Fuel in Water System??”

    Come on!

    Not the first time headlines are screwy.

    • General Aviation News Staff says

      September 17, 2019 at 7:31 am

      Ken: Thanks for pointing that out. It’s fixed now.

    • Greg says

      March 16, 2020 at 3:16 pm

      After reading the article, I think the title was appropriate for that pilot.

  2. Henry K. Cooper says

    September 17, 2019 at 6:26 am

    He sampled the contents of the fuel strainer? Or did he just pull up the drain handle and “pee” some contents out? Who knows?

    He ran the engine for 30 minutes, and had no water issues, and ran it again for 7 minutes before take-off? Odd that nothing was detected then.

    Was the aircraft parked nose low when he sumped the tanks? May account for what water was not drained.

    The aircraft was out of annual by four years, but he flew it anyway? On what authority…..a ferry permit?

    This was an accident that didn’t have to occur.

  3. Terk Williams says

    September 17, 2019 at 5:07 am

    As a ferry pilot (some decades ago…) I realized that the only airplane more tenuous than a raggedy old bird headed for overhaul was a brand new airplane. I hauled a few Ag Cats from Elmira, NY to such places as Paramaribo, Surinam. It was a great time but on more than one occasion I drained QUARTS of water much of which had the appearance of fuel and even carried some of the fuel smell. A casual preflight and I would gave joined the gliders. If in doubt rub it between your fingers and maybe spit in the sample (or add a bit of water, coffee.. whatever is handy). The first time your “water” simply disperses in your “fuel” sample you’ll get it…. feel free to try this at home… Shake a bit of gas in a larger quantity of water the. Smell, feel the water. One more tool in your bag of (butt saving) tricks. OH… and you can’t do this with rubber gloves on… a version of this experiment is also how you test for alcohol (ethynol,methanol) in your auto gas sample. See the instructions that are available on line from Peterson Avn or the EAA.

  4. JimH in CA says

    September 16, 2019 at 8:52 am

    The title may be appropriate and pilots need to understand that even a few ounces of water can stop an engine.
    When I rented aircraft that were parked on the ramp, I’d go to a wing tip and rock the aircraft to get any water to move to the quick drain areas…. which were 5 in each wing on a C172R. I’d do this as many times as needed to see no water when sumping the tanks., then sump the gascolator.

  5. Mark W says

    September 16, 2019 at 6:57 am

    Fuel in water system?

    • gbigs says

      September 17, 2019 at 6:53 am

      It’s a trick FAA written test question. Everyone flunked it.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines