• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Aviat Husky vs CubCrafters XCub

By Ben Sclair · August 11, 2016 ·

For years, if you were in the market for a new, Part 23 backcountry taildragger, Aviat’s Husky was one of a small handful of options a buyer had. The new XCub from CubCrafters gives the market another option.

The beauty of this new competitive pairing is both Aviat and CubCrafters have a great deal of experience of bringing top-of-the-line niche product to market.

Plus, there’s no waiting. Well, for the most part. A buyer can sign a contract and plan for a delivery date written in ink.

With all the press XCub earned following its debut, I got to thinking about how it stacked up to the venerable Husky. The two are closer than I originally thought…

Aviat Husky vs CubCrafters XCub
AircraftHuskyXCub
Length22 ft 7 in23 ft 10 in
Wingspan35 ft 6 in34 ft 4 in
WEIGHT
Gross Weight2,250 lbs2,300 lbs
Empty Weight1,275 lbs1,216 lbs
Useful Load925 lbs1,084 lbs
Fuel Capacity50 gallons49 gallons
Cargo Area19.3 cu ft26 cu ft
PERFORMANCE
Max Speed145 mph153 mph
Cruise Speed – 75% Power140 mph145 mph
Stall Speed – Full Flaps, Power Off53 mph46 mph
Takeoff Distance200 ft170 ft
Landing Distance350 ft170 ft
Rate of Climb1,500 fpm1,500 fpm
Range800 miles800 miles
POWER
EngineLycoming O-360-A1PLycoming O-360-C1G
Horsepower180 hp180 hp
PRICE (2016)$302,503 Tundra Edition$301,000 Standard Edition

I wonder, is this the new Chevy vs Ford?

About Ben Sclair

Ben Sclair is the Publisher of General Aviation News, a pilot, husband to Deb and dad to Zenith, Brenna, and Jack. Oh, and a staunch supporter of general aviation.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Jon "Jughead" Counsell says

    October 24, 2016 at 6:26 pm

    The differences in the cargo area is a HUGE advantage for the XCub. I have flown both planes, the XCub was by far superior

  2. Jim Roberts says

    August 23, 2016 at 3:32 pm

    Xcub actually performs to the numbers claimed. A Husky will not go 125 mph! A 180HP Xcub outperforms a 200HP Husky in every way.

    • Chip Coslor says

      October 20, 2016 at 9:00 pm

      I’d have to disagree with that statement, at least with regards to my bone stock 1991 A1 Husky. With 8.50’s, my husky was an honest 130mph airplane, with the 31″ bushwheels it’s right at 122mph.

  3. Jim Roberts says

    August 23, 2016 at 3:23 pm

    Should’t you actually go fly these before you put out a comparison? You are making conclusions based on brochure numbers? I understand that Xcub actually demonstrated it’s cruise, landing and takeoff numbers. Husky will NEVER cruise anywhere near the 140 mph mark, perhaps 125 mph is more like it on a good day. The 180HP Xcub way outperformed a 200HP Husky badly at a recent fly-off.

  4. Billy says

    August 14, 2016 at 2:38 pm

    Another important difference between the two is that the Husky can be IFR certified and to my knowledge as of now, the XCub is only VFR certified. That may not be super important if the owner plans on solely flying to off airport locations, or from backcountry strip to backcountry strip, it definitely adds flexibility for the pilot of the Husky to have an IFR certified aircraft if they want to fly from a backcountry strip to a general aviation airport

    • Graeme says

      August 21, 2016 at 10:24 am

      I’ve often wondered what flying an approach in actual IMC in something as light as Husky would be like. I guess for something benign like a California marine layer it would be pretty useful

  5. Darryl Braun says

    August 12, 2016 at 8:48 am

    You should have started with the bottom number so I could stop reading right there. $300,000! The performance really doesn’t matter after you realize there’s no way you’re ever going to sit in one of these. Thank God for the home built industry. I can get 2 or 3 Murphy Moose ready to go for that kind of money. Nice planes though.

  6. RayLRiv says

    August 12, 2016 at 8:46 am

    Either one’s a WIN for me! I’ll take them BOTH, please!

  7. Amy says

    August 12, 2016 at 8:32 am

    What about the CubCrafters Top Cub (Part 23-certified in in 2004), or the American Champion Scout (Part 21 and Part 23), or even the much more obscure Super 18 (Part 23-certified in 2009)? I’ll give you that the Super 18 was never widespread enough to count as competition or a choice, but the Top Cub was a fairly well-known outgrowth of CubCrafters’ spare & surplus rebuild program and the Scout has been around and industry-accepted for decades. This is not to say these aren’t two airplanes buyers will want to compare, but to say that customers didn’t have much of a choice until the XCub came about is also fairly inaccurate.

    • Ben Sclair says

      August 12, 2016 at 10:53 am

      Good points, all of them, Amy. I’ll be adding your suggestions to my growing list of aircraft to compare going forward.

      • Chris says

        August 24, 2016 at 3:20 pm

        I own a Husky A-1B. With small tires it will cruise at 135mph 25″ 2500rpm.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines