• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

VFR pilot flies into IMC, kills 5

By NTSB · September 15, 2011 ·

This September 2009 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

Aircraft: Piper Cherokee 6 Injuries: 5 Fatal. Location: Tulsa, Okla. Aircraft damage: Destroyed.

What reportedly happened: The non-instrument-rated private pilot obtained a standard weather briefing for a cross-country flight. At the time of the briefing, the ceiling was 600 feet overcast with four miles visibility. He was advised that a VFR flight was not recommended. Approximately four hours later, he radioed ground control for taxi and a VFR clearance. The controller informed the pilot that the airport was in IFR conditions. He then requested and received an IFR clearance.

He departed and had to be reminded by the local and departure controllers to make several course and altitude changes. He acknowledged the changes but took no action. He also was warned of antennas near his position.

Review of radar data revealed the pilot’s altitude varied from 1,100 feet MSL to 1,600 feet MSL. The last radar target was at 1,200 feet MSL in a left descending turn, although the pilot had been instructed to climb to 4,000 feet. The airplane hit a guy wire on a 600-foot radio transmission tower at a terrain elevation of 860 feet MSL.

The pilot’s descending turn when he was supposed to be climbing is indicative of spatial disorientation.

The post-accident examination of the airframe, flight controls, engine assembly, and accessories revealed no anomalies. The altimeter, transponder, and transponder automatic altitude reporting system test was current. The gyroscopic instruments were destroyed and could not be examined.

Probable cause: The non-instrument-rated pilot’s decision to attempt flight in instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in spatial disorientation and an in-flight collision with a radio tower guy wire.

For more information: NTSB.gov. NTSB Identification: CEN09FA562

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Russell says

    September 16, 2011 at 2:32 pm

    There is an unwillingness by instructors to put students into actual IMC conditions towards the end of their training so they can actually experience the problem and feelings of spatial disorientation with a competent instructor on board at the other controls before receiving their pilot certificate. I suspect this is because many instructors can not or do not afford the continuing training that an instrument rated pilot must pursue to remain competent. Once a pilot has experienced the problems and the shock, especially if it occurs at night, I doubt he or she will make this kind of mistake. EVER!

  2. Brian says

    September 16, 2011 at 12:33 am

    After further reading it appears the pilot was a doctor. Coincidence or archetype?

  3. Brian says

    September 16, 2011 at 12:25 am

    I’ve been reading these for awhile. This is the most outrageous example of ineptitude I could imagine. Hod did this fool convince 5 other people to board a plane with him at the controls? Tragic!

  4. Victor says

    September 15, 2011 at 7:01 pm

    WHY??? Why do VFR pilots think they can fly in IMC without training? I just don’t get that. The IFR rating is a rating for a REASON.

    What’s sad is that when he asked for a VFR clearance and was denied, he then asked for an IFR clearance and it was given. So many people telling him NOT to fly and he did it anyway, costng the lives of 4 other people besides him.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines