• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Plane crashes into porta-potties

By NTSB · May 1, 2011 ·

This May 2009 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

Aircraft: Cessna 182. Injuries: 1 Minor. Location: Puyallup, Wash. Aircraft damage: Destroyed.

What reportedly happened: The airplane had just undergone maintenance, including replacement of the fuel-sending units, which required draining of the fuel tanks. The pilot was under the impression that the mechanic had added 20 gallons of fuel to both main tanks after the task was completed so he did not physically check the fuel level in the tanks, but noted that both fuel gauges indicated the same amount of fuel prior to flight. The pilot took off. The engine lost power when the airplane was about 500 feet above ground level.

The pilot started a steep 180° turn with the intention of landing on the taxiway parallel to the runway. However, local law enforcement was conducting an exercise on the field, and when they responded to the perceived emergency they drove down the taxiway. The pilot opted not to land on the taxiway but was running out of altitude and options. He decided the grass area between the taxiway and runway was too soft to use for landing because of recent rainfall. Next to the airport is a port-a-potty maintenance and storage facility. The pilot chose to fly the airplane into a 50-foot-square block of the plastic port-a-potty units, which had a pile of wood chips behind them. As the airplane settled, it nosed over, and came to rest in the wood chip pile.

By the time the FAA inspector arrived on the scene the airplane had been moved to a hangar. The inspector noted that maintenance personnel drained no fuel from the left tank and 20 gallons from the right tank. The left wing was intact. The right wing was damaged. The fuel selector was in the OFF position.

On a follow-up exam, investigators added five gallons of fuel to the left wing tank. The engine started immediately without hesitation. It accelerated smoothly to 1,800 rpm, and a magneto check revealed no anomalies. The engine was decelerated to idle rpm, the engine ran smoothly, and shutdown was unremarkable. The airplane had a recording engine data management unit installed. Data indicated that fuel flow dropped to 0 six seconds prior to a loss of rpm.

Probable cause: A loss of engine power due to fuel starvation as a result of the pilot’s failure to verify the fuel levels in the tanks, and, his failure to select the proper fuel tank.

For more information: NTSB.gov

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Rod Beck says

    May 6, 2011 at 7:28 pm

    I guess this dude was simply “s–t out of luck”!

    • Ben Sclair says

      May 7, 2011 at 12:34 am

      Funny

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines