• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

SC airport reports continued supply of Mogas

By Kent Misegades · December 3, 2009 ·

Thanks to Cal Hoffman of the Barnwell Regional Airport (BNL) in Barnwell, S.C., for informing us that the airport has a supply of 93 octane (AKI), ethanol-free, lead-free Mogas on the field.

He does not expect any disruptions to the supply in the near future, and suggests that the strong demand for ethanol-free fuel from the marine industry on the coast of South Carolina and Georgia is the cause.

At the time of this posting, Mogas at BNL cost only $3.05 compared to a national average of $3.30, and a national average of $4.53 for 100LL.

The GAfuels Blog is written by three private pilots concerned about the future availability of fuels for piston-engine aircraft. They are:

  • Dean Billing (Sisters, Ore.) – an expert on autogas and ethanol
  • Kent Misegades (Cary, N.C.) – an aerospace engineer and aviation journalist
  • Todd Petersen (Minden, Neb.) – former aerial applicator and owner of more than 150 Mogas STCs for aircraft

For a list of airports that have ethanol-free fuel and those no longer pumping it, compiled by the authors, follow this link.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Todd L. Petersen says

    December 4, 2009 at 9:54 am

    It should be somewhat less than 100LL but it will have to be higher priced than premium autogas.

  2. Kent Misegades says

    December 4, 2009 at 9:53 am

    Karl, here is what Dean Billing says about this. Kent

    Considering that it is 100 LL without lead and therefor has a new ASTM number, my guess is the ASTM number will replace the cost of the TEL, so, ipso facto, 94UL will cost exactly the same as 100 LL. 🙂

    Seriously, it IS 100 LL avgas without TEL so the only cost that is going to decrease is the transportation cost which could decrease slightly because it could go through a pipeline and they won’t have to purge the tank cars or truck tanks to ship other unleaded product. Other than that nothing changes, and face facts, a big part of the cost of 100 LL is extremely small production runs and liability costs.

    — Dean

  3. Karl DeJean says

    December 3, 2009 at 8:35 pm

    I’ve been wondering if we do switch to UL94 and it works in our aircraft, will the price be about the same price as premium auto gas (about 2.75 to 3.00 dollars per gallon by todays prices). That would make it much cheaper to operate my aircraft.

    Karl

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines