Who foots the bill?
The aviation community is pretty well united behind the idea that airports have real value. Not all our neighbors are convinced, however. That doubt becomes especially pronounced when cash gets tight and somebody notices that airports are not free, and that municipally owned airports do not tend to generate huge sums of money that flows into the general fund.
So what is the value of an airport to the neighboring community? And who should foot the bill for running the place? These questions come up from time to time. At the moment, they are coming up and making news in Kelso, Washington, where at least one city councilman has decided that the airport may be of greater benefit to the residents as raw land than in its present form.
There is no doubt that a well-run, professionally managed airport can bring jobs, commercial investment, leisure services, and tourism to the area it serves. That’s to say nothing of the emergency access point it represents in times of real need. However, irrespective of that reality, the underlying issues that affect the airport’s success tend to involve management, funding, and creativity.
What benefit does the airport offer, and who is going to pay the bills to keep the lights on? As Kelso struggles with these questions, it behooves the rest of us to keep tabs on the situation. Because these questions, and these issues may very well pop up in our own back yards one day. Having experience with the discussion and an understanding of the concerns of the non-flying community can give us an edge when the battle comes to our home turf.
Read more about Kelso’s airport issues here.
Jamie Beckett is a CFI and A&P mechanic who stepped into the political arena in an effort to promote and protect GA at his local airport. You can reach him at Jamie@GeneralAviationNews.com.













